1) No more reliance upon entropy





A New Thermodynamics

By Kent W. Mayhew
thermowebsite3001025.jpg thermowebsite3001022.jpg thermowebsite3001019.jpg thermowebsite3001018.jpg thermowebsite3001017.jpg thermowebsite3001016.jpg thermowebsite3001013.jpg thermowebsite3001012.jpg
Help support this site
Page 2 
New Thermodynamics is based upon: 
What else differentiates  New Thermodynamics from the Old Versions ? 

2) Expanding systems must do work (PdV) onto the atmosphere as defined by the first law of thermodynamics. And this is irreversible i.e. it is lost work! This concept was first published by this author in the journal Physics Essays in 2015 




1) Intermolecular collisions are no longer considered as being elastic. The concept of kinetic theory being based upon inelastic collisions has been challenged and published by this author in Journal: Progress in Physics (April 2018 & July 2017)




2) Entropy based second law becomes a false postulate




Do you want to know why traditional thermodynamics is so problematic  then click here for problematic thermodynamics
Are you ready to see how we can construct a simpler understanding
      i.e. New Thermodynamics then click here for page 1
To Page 1 
To problematic traditional thermodynamcs 
Go to Blogs
Help support this site
This website is copyright of Kent W. Mayhew who in 2018 resides in Ottawa Ontario Canada
   This website is full of new ideas, which are the property of Kent W. Mayhew.  
    Furthermore you are free to share, copy or distribute in any manner that you feel is warranted, so long as you fully respectfully reference the author (Kent W. Mayhew) in a manner that you deem fit. 
If you have a science related website and want to have links attached here please contact us and we will see if links are suitable.
thermowebsite3001006.jpg thermowebsite3001005.jpg

3) Constructive logic onto which a mathematical construct is formulated. 




Few experts realize that accepted thermodynamics is not based upon constructive logic, rather it is based upon an elaborate mathematical construct to which we are continually try to put logic to i.e. often it is like trying to put a square peg into a round hole! NO wonder the true meaning of thermodynamic entropy still lacks clarity!
Seemingly our indoctrination prevents most from accepting the above.
Would we not be better served by devising a logic and only then determining the math that fits that logic?  
Free sections of my book:
Say no to entropy"