A New Thermodynamics


By Kent W. Mayhew
Blog:Joules Experiment & Ideal Gas Paradox
thermowebsite2036016.jpg thermowebsite2036013.jpg thermowebsite2036011.jpg thermowebsite2036008.jpg thermowebsite2036007.jpg thermowebsite2036006.jpg thermowebsite2036004.jpg

Joules's Experiment & Ideal Gas Paradox

Reminder concerning entropy

Entropy remains the poorest understood parameter. In the 19th century, Rudolf Clausius realized that something when multiplied by temperature represented energy. Since then, entropy has taken on an array of different meanings. To many, its definition wrongly revolves around Boltzmann’s consideration that entropy signifies a system’s disorder; essentially entropy represents the “randomness of matter in incessant motion”9. A more recent but equally poor definition is that entropy is “the dispersal of a system’s molecular energy”10 .

See blog on Entropy

Other Considerations

Consider    TS=E+PV              1)

Note eqn 1) can be obtained by integrating the isothermal isobaric relation;

                TdS=dE+PdV            2)

Of course differentiating eqn 1) gives:

                TdS+SdT=dE+PdV+VdP   3)

 Seemingly traditional thermodynamics avoids the above by hiding the obvious. This is accomplished by writing enthalpy (H) as

              H=E+PV       4)

Although enthalpy is really a chemical reaction thing, it also hides eqn 1). We should really write

              TS=H=E+PV       5)

The above is further hidden by the differential shuffle that starts with eqn 2)

  It must be stated that  differentiating eqn 1 as stated by eqn 3) has issues concerning its logic when one realizes that PdV is the work done onto thte atmophere   See  Differential Shuffle

Ideal Gas Law Paradox

Bearing in mind the above stated definitions of entropy, consider the ideal gas in Vessel A, as shown in Fig 1.1.2. A valve is opened and the gas is allowed to isothermally disperse into Vessel B, as is illustrated in Fig 1.1.3.

We expect that: PdV= -VdP. In other words, as the gas’s volume doubles its pressure decreases by half.

 As this ideal gas’s volume increases, the molecules’ randomness, and/or the dispersal of energy, must increase. Therefore by definition, its entropy (S) should increase. If a system’s entropy is increasing, and there is no total energy change within the system, then shouldn’t we expect that the ideal gas’s temperature (T) will decrease, such that:TdS=-SdT?  But that makes no sense because the process is isothermal (dT=0), allowing Boyle’s law to remain valid, i.e.: PdV= -VdP. Certainly, if the internal energy is related to the potential associated with intermolecular bonding, then the ideal gas’s internal energy does not change.

Seemingly, there is something wrong with our understanding of thermodynamics. What could it be?  Perhaps it is because the ideal gas law is only an approximation! Although valid, such an argument lacks scientific gumption. Other possibilities:

1) Perhaps, we must reconsider     

 TdS+SdT=dE+PdV+VdP    3)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        

If  PdV=-VdP and dT=0, then eqn 3) implies:

    TdS=dE              6)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          

If eqn 6) defines changes to our isothermally expanding ideal gas, then one cannot isothermally expand a gas and maintain constant internal energy within that system of gas. In which case the internal energy (E) of our isothermally expanding ideal gas has seemingly increased. Does this mean that the internal energy changes, while the intermolecular bonding energy remains constant, as expected for an ideal gas? It all seems convoluted.

Click: For an expanding piston-cylinder 

2) Perhaps we must reconsider what entropy is!

Since: PdV=-VdP and dT=0 and if dE=0, then dS=0. Consider our previously given two definitions of entropy. During the isothermal expansion of the ideal gas, both the randomness of molecules in incessant motion and/or the dispersal of the gas molecules energy, have increased, yet there is no predicted entropy change? Seemingly, the virtues of entropy should be queried!

Ultimately the ideal gas law has suffered a paradox. One might argue that our analysis is too simplified.  But to do so alleges that the ideal gas is now complex, which it is not. Or that eqn 1) can not be obtained by the integration of eqn 2). And herein resides the issue. In order to circumnavigate such simple logic, like that given above, traditional thermodynamics has unwittingly complicated the simple.

 Joule’s Experiment

The experiment illustrated by Fig 1.1.2 and 1.1.3 is known as Joule’s experiment for gases.  James Prescott Joule concluded that his experiment shows that the gas’s internal energy is a function of temperature but not volume. Obviously the isothermal expansion of an ideal gas implies that dE=0. Even if his result is accepted as correct, his experiment remains misguided; if energy were extracted from the surrounding heat bath (which it was not) then would it be measurable? Probably not!

Whether we consider Joule’s experiment, or simply the isothermal expansion of any ideal gas, the ideal gas law suffers a paradox. Traditionalists can circumnavigate this by shuffling the differential equations around, and then boldly subscribing to a convoluted logic.  Understandably, those bestowed with such convictions can be awkward to reason with.

This website is copyright of Kent W. Mayhew who in 2018 resides in Ottawa Ontario Canada
   This website is full of new ideas, which are the property of Kent W. Mayhew.  
    Furthermore you are free to share, copy or distribute in any manner that you feel is warranted, so long as you fully respectfully reference the author (Kent W. Mayhew) in a manner that you deem fit. 
Help support this site
Buy my book