A New Thermodynamics

Blog: Probability: Gives results not Reasons

By Kent W. Mayhew

www.newthermodynamics.com

Probabilities Give Results, Not Reasons

March 21, 2015

|

Kent W Mayhew

 

 Probabilities can be used to determine the results of many processes, such as:

 

1)  The dealing of cards, there is a probability for getting a full house and another for getting a pair and still another for getting a pair of jacks.

 

2) Rolling of the dice, there is an equal probability for each dice to show 1 though six and there are different probabilities for the sum of the dice with seven holding the distinction of being the highest probability.

 

3) A drunkard walking in random directions, there is even a probability of him finding his rightful bed.

 

  Of course there are too many processes to which probabilities apply to list here. In all cases the probability gives  RESULTS and not the REASONS for the event. Many of us are taught to master these probabilities and the various distributions in thermodynamics. But as with anything, we walk very dangerous ground when we start thinking in terms of a given set of probabilities providing a reason rather than a result.  Yet this is done all the time, and we physicists are as much to blame as anyone.

 

  Too often we boldly state this or that based upon solutions that incorporate probabilities, when the reality is that our deduction can only be at best deemed, possibly correct. The only way to fully validate what we now believe is to find some constructive logic that gives the results without the necessity of using a probability. And even then an empirical result does not prove a given constructive logic, rather it can only disprove your theory, or at the very least make you rethink what your analysis.

 

  In other words any given empirical result may have more than one theory, and if your theory is based upon probabilities then there is strong probably that something is amiss with your theory.

 

 Nowhere in the history of mankind has this been more true than in thermodynamics. Herein we formulated entropy and the second law, then applied eigen values/energies onto the systemís molecules, construed probabilities, determined the number of possible states; And then set:  TdS=dE+PdV. 

 

 Then we formulated traditional thermodynamics around the above stated probabilities and all of its accompanying mathematics. Surely a simpler approach would have been to realize that lost work is the work required to displace our atmosphere, that being: W=PdV.

 

  Without a doubt, not only did the above led to the belief by too many in a complicated thermodynamics which was not based upon constructive logic, but it also wrongly reinforced some theorists beliefs in the powers of statistical physics/mechanics; namely its power in determining reasons rather than simply results.

 

 In hindsight you should now realize that the reason for lost work is the upwardly displacement of our atmosphere. And the fact that statistical thermodynamics can determine all the possible results wherein;  W=PdV just proves how powerful statistical physics/mechanics is as a mathematical entity.

 

            Sincerely KWM

 

Copyright Kent W. Mayhew

thermowebsite2027016.jpg thermowebsite2027013.jpg thermowebsite2027011.jpg thermowebsite2027008.jpg thermowebsite2027007.jpg thermowebsite2027006.jpg thermowebsite2027004.jpg
Help support this site
Help support this site
Sommerfield quote:"Thermodynamics is a funny subject. The first time you go through it, you don't understand it at all. The second time you go through it, you think you understand it, except for one or two small points. The third time you go through it, you know you don't understand it, but by that time you are so used to it, so it doesn't bother you any more."
This website is copyright of Kent W. Mayhew who in 2018 resides in Ottawa Ontario Canada
 
   This website is full of new ideas, which are the property of Kent W. Mayhew.  
 
    Furthermore you are free to share, copy or distribute in any manner that you feel is warranted, so long as you fully respectfully reference the author (Kent W. Mayhew) in a manner that you deem fit.